Articles Posted in Workplace Hazards

by

The Occupational Safety Health Administration has recently updated procedures to help whistleblowers who believe that their employers are not following safety laws in relation to nuclear and environmental safety or security, clean air, safe drinking water, solid waste, and toxic substances. Now consistent with OSHA’s other whistleblower procedures, the new rule also helps workers to bring the violations of their employers to the attention of authorities and helps those who might have difficulty filing a written complaint or filing a complaint in English. The new rule will ultimately help to prevent workplace safety hazards by providing workers easier access to filing complaints.

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, Dr. David Michaels said “Silenced workers are not safe workers…Changes in the whistleblower provisions make good on the promise to stand by those workers who have the courage to come forward when they believe their employer is violating an environmental or nuclear safety law.”

The rule provides final regulations of the employee protection agreement, known as the “whistleblower agreement”, of the original Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. OSHA maintains whistleblower regulations for nuclear and environmental workers and also protects workers who report violations of airlines, commercial carriers, consumer products, financial reform, health care reform, pipelines, public transit, railroads, maritime and securities laws. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers must provide healthy and safe workplaces for their employees.

For a complete guide to environmental workplace safety standards here in Massachusetts, please visit the Massachusetts Energy and Environmental Affairs website.

If you are a whistleblower and work in an environmentally unsafe workplace or have been injured in the workplace, please do not hesitate to contact one of our experienced lawyers for assistance and a free consultation.

Source:

OSHA publishes final rule establishing procedures for handling nuclear and environmental retaliation complaints, OSHA Trade News Release, March 10, 2011 Continue reading

by

The Philadelphia retail and car service company, Pep Boys, has been charged by the US Labor Department’s OSHA with repeat and serious citations. After an inspection at the company’s Hamden, Connecticut, facility, OSHA found that workers were exposed to numerous work safety hazards, including potential electric shock due to damaged power cords and laceration hazards due to the lack of a safety guard on a grinder. The company was previously charged with similar citations at their Orange facility in Connecticut, and were thus charged with $70,000 for these serious repeat violations. They were also charged with $5,000 for the lack of cover plates on electrical outlets and a snap switch box.

OSHA’s Area Director in Bridgeport, Robert Kowalski, said “The size of these fines reflects the fact that Pep Boys previously was cited for a number of similar hazards at its Orange, Conn., location…It would be to the benefit of its workers’ safety companywide for this employer to determine if similar hazards exist at other stores and to eliminate them if they do.” Here in Massachusetts, Pep Boys has facilities in Everett, Dedham, Salem, Springfield, and West Springfield.

OSHA issues a serious citation when there is a significant probability that death or physical harm could happen from a workplace safety hazard that the employer knew about and/or should have already fixed. OSHA issues a repeat citation when the employer was previously cited for the same or similar violations of workplace safety within the last five years.

If you have been injured at work, feel free to contact one of our experienced lawyers for a free consultation.

Source:

US Labor Department’s OSHA cites Pep Boys for machine guarding and electrical hazards at Hamden, Conn., location, OSHA Regional News Release, March 3, 2011 Continue reading

by

Two Massachusetts contractors have been cited for similar trench violations by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration within the past week.

On February 25, 2011, the first contractor cited was A.A. Will Corp., of Stoughton, for willful and repeat violations of workplace trench safety at the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s Wonderland Station in Revere, where they were installing electrical vaults in the parking lot of the station. Prompted by complaints of an unsafe jobsite, OSHA found workers in a ditch deeper than 5 feet without collapse protection or a ladder, which is a repeat violation for this contractor for a similar situation in February 2010 at a Boston jobsite. The company faces $69,300 in proposed fines.

The second contractor cited, Trainor Construction Co., of Canton, Massachusetts, was cited on February 28, 2011, for willful and serious violations of workplace safety at a jobsite at 270 Centre Street in Boston. Upon the inspection of the jobsite, where Trainor was replacing a water main, OSHA found that a 7-7 1/2 foot trench had inadequate protection against collapse and lacked the needed bracing for an unsupported concrete structure next to the excavation. Furthermore, employees were not wearing reflective vests or bright clothes to protect them from oncoming vehicle traffic. The company faces a total of $29,000 in proposed fines.

OSHA recognizes trenching and excavating as one of the most dangerous aspects of construction because of the risk of cave-ins. Thus, OSHA requires that all trenches deeper than 5 feet need to be guarded and braced for potential collapse. Soil analysis is also important before digging starts. Additional hazards, such as underground power lines or natural gas, also need to be noted. Prior to workers entering the trench, it needs to be inspected by someone who is trained in trench safety. OSHA provides a complete overview of their trench safety requirements on their Trenching and Excavation page.

OSHA’s Area Director for Boston and Southeastern Massachusetts, Brenda Gordon, said, “An unprotected trench can become a prison or a grave in seconds if its walls cave in on workers…Employers should never allow employees into a trench until it has been effectively protected against collapse. Workers’ lives depend on it.”

Our lawyers have over 25 years of experience representing clients who have been injured on the job. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you would like a free consultation.

Sources:

US Labor Department’s OSHA cites Stoughton, Mass., contractor for failing to provide cave-in protection at Revere, Mass., jobsite, OSHA Regional News Release, February 25, 2011
US Labor Department’s OSHA cites Canton, Mass., contractor for failing to provide cave-in protection at Boston jobsite, OSHA Regional News Release, February 28, 2011 Continue reading

by

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has recently cited a Masssachusetts contractor currently working on the Hultman Aqueduct project in Weston for repeat and serious violations of workplace safety. The Barletta Heavy Division Inc., from Canton, has been charged with a $52,500 fine for these violations.

Barletta’s previous citations were from inspections in 2008 for potential fall hazards at their jobsites at Commonwealth Pier and Ashmont Station in Boston. When OSHA inspected the aqueduct tunnel, they found similar hazards, such as an unprotected 14-foot fall and an inadequate ladder that did not reach over the edge the required three feet, making the ladder unstable. The company is charged with $37,500 for these repeated safety violations.

Furthermore, OSHA cited Barletta with three serious violations for extremely high noise in the tunnel and their employees did not have hearing protection, a lack of fire extinguishers in the tunnel, and for a live electrical panel that was exposed. OSHA issues serious citations only when there is a serious possibility that death or injury could result from a workplace hazard that the employer could have fixed. These three serious citations resulted in $15,000.

Our experienced lawyers have represented clients throughout Massachusetts who have suffered injuries due to workplace hazards for over 25 years. If you have a question in regards to a workers’ compensation case and would like a free consultation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Source:
US Department of Labor’s OSHA cites Canton, Mass., contractor on Hultman Aqueduct project in Weston, Mass., for repeat and serious violations, OSHA Regional News Release, February 22, 2011 Continue reading

by

W.R. Grace, the chemical company that is accused of asbestos contamination throughout the United States, will pay over $800,000 and will continue cleaning their nine contaminated sites in Massachusetts. Attorney General Martha Coakley’s Office, who made the claims on behalf of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP), has recently approved the settlement with W.R. Grace. The company will have to pay MassDEP $700,298, including 4.19% interest, and $105,582.97 with 4.19% interest for past clean-up costs.

After hundreds of thousands of lawsuits involving past employees and people living near their plants who were exposed to asbestos, W.R. Grace filed for bankruptcy in 2001. Attorney General Coakley said: “W.R. Grace has the means to pay its environmental liability to the Commonwealth and perform cleanup actions at its contaminated properties…We are gratified that the bankruptcy court agreed it would be wrong to allow Grace to walk away from its responsibilities.”

The nine contaminated sites throughout the state are: the former Zonolite Plant in Easthampton, the Daramic Plant in Acton, the Cambridge Plant in Cambridge, the Knox Trail site in Acton and Concord, a pipeline alongside the Massachusetts Military Reservation in Sandwich, the Acton Superfund site in Acton and Concord, the Wells G&H Superfund site in Woburn, the Blackburn & Union Privileges Superfund site in Walpole, and the Sutton Brook Superfund site in Tewksbury.

Asbestos is a natural mineral fiber that has been commonly used in manufactured products such as building construction materials for insulation and as a fire-retardant. Asbestos is resistance to heat and decay but can eventually break up into microscopic dust fibers that, when inhaled, can remain in the body for years causing numerous lung diseases, cancers, and possibly death.

Workplace exposure of asbestos can be common among people who work in mining industries, and industries that make or use asbestos products on a regular basis. Asbestos exposure at work is most often found in the construction industry (especially when building demolition or renovation jobs are involved), the manufacturing of materials containing asbestos (such as insulation or tiles), and the car repair industry, especially if repairing brakes or clutches.

Our experienced lawyers represent clients throughout Massachusetts who have suffered injuries or illnesses because of unsafe work conditions. If you have a question in regards to a workers’ compensation case and would like a free consultation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sources:

AG Coakley’s Office Will Recover Over $800,000 From W.R. Grace in Bankruptcy Proceedings, W.R. Grace Also Commits to Perform Ongoing Cleanup of Contaminated Sites, Office of Attorney General Coakley Press Release, February 15, 2011
Asbestos Information & Resource Guide, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Continue reading

by

The Beverly facility of the Northeast Hospital Corporation faces up to $63,000 in fines for serious and repeat violations of electrical hazards. After a hospital employee brought the workplace hazards to the attention of authorities, the Andover Area Office of the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) conducted an inspection in which they found that there was a high potential for employee electric shock, resulting in four serious citations and $28,000 in fines.

Reasons for OSHA’s citations included:
• Employees lacked protective guards while working on energized electrical equipment
• Electrical protective equipment was not tested regularly • Electrical safety practices were not used • Procedures not implemented to control hazardous energy while replacing breakers

Additionally, OSHA issued a repeat citation and a fine of $35,000 for dormant openings in electrical panels and cabinet motor control centers that should have been closed, as previously cited in May of 2010, but were not yet fixed. Jeffrey Erskine, OSHA’s Area Director for Essex and Middlesex Counties said, “Electricity can kill or severely injure workers, literally in a flash. There is no margin for error here…it is vitally important for the safety and well-being of employees working with electricity that they be properly trained and equipped with effective protective equipment.”

OSHA issues such citations when it is likely that death or a serious physical injury could result from a hazard that the employer knew about or should have known about. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for ensuring safe and healthy workplaces for their employees.

Our experienced lawyers represent clients throughout Massachusetts who have suffered injuries because of inadequate workplace safety. If you have a question in regards to an electric shock or workers’ compensation case and would like a free consultation, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Source:

US Department of Labor’s OSHA cites Northeast Hospital Corp. for failing to protect workers against electrical hazards at Beverly, Mass., facility, OSHA Regional News Release, February 14, 2011 Continue reading

by

Administrative Law Judge Covette Rooney has recently ruled to uphold the U.S. Department of Labor’s eight citations for excavation violations, numerous construction hazards, and $91,200 in fines issued to a Boston contractor for insufficient work safety at a jobsite in Newton, Massachusetts. Shawn Telsi, doing business as Life Time Homes, Green Pines and/or Telsi Builders contested the citations and fines brought against him by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Telsi subsequently had the case heard by Rooney, a commission administrative law judge, who found all four willful and four serious citations against the company to be valid. The citations were issued due to the lack of head protection, the deficiency of cave-in protection in a pit that was at least 14-feet deep, for not having a safe exit from the excavation, soil that was in multiple piles at the edges of the trench, and because of the risk of impalement due to protruding and unguarded steel rebar. Marthe Kent, OSHA’s New England regional administrator, said “Serious, life-threatening hazards remained uncorrected even after they were brought to this employer’s attention…had the unprotected 14-foot-high excavation wall collapsed, it would have engulfed workers who were pouring concrete formwork and crushed them beneath tons of concrete, soil and debris.”

Michael Felsen, the Labor Department’s regional solicitor for New England, said “Employers must understand that they cannot disregard standards meant to protect the life and safety of their employees without facing consequences.” Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthy workplaces for their employees.

For over 40 years, our attorneys have been representing personal injury and workers’ compensation victims. If you have a question or would like a free consultation, feel free to contact us and speak to one of our experienced attorneys.

Source:

US Labor Department secures decision affirming willful and serious trenching violations, $91,200 in fines against Boston contractor, OSHA Regional News Release, February 7, 2011 Continue reading

by

On January 20, 2011, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) cited Durasol, Corp., which manufactures hard gum erasers, for 13 serious violations of workplace health and safety standards at its plant in Amesbury. The manufacturer faces $43,800 in proposed fines.

The citations were issued for a lack of an emergency action plan, inadequate employee training in responding to emergencies, inadequate respirator training, lack of respirator fit-testing and medical evaluation, failure to evaluate respiratory hazards, unmarked exit routes, unlabeled containers of chemicals, severely corroded electrical equipment, an extension cord used in place of permanent wiring, inadequately guarded floor holes, missing stair rails, and an uninspected and improperly located emergency eyewash/shower.

OSHA issues a serious citation when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees.

Continue reading

by

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has laid $238,000 worth of fines against the U.S. Postal Service for “willful and serious violations of safety standards” at the Central Massachusetts Processing and Distribution Center in Shrewsbury, Mass.

Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Dr. David Michaels explains, “For years, the Postal Service knew that allowing untrained employees to work on electrical equipment exposed workers to serious injury or worse. Despite this knowledge, the Postal Service did not take the necessary steps to change its practices and eliminate the hazards.”

The serious fine comes after an inspection that began on June 29, 2010, in response to a worker complaint about hazardous conditions involving the use of electrical equipment. The inspection found that unqualified employees at the Shrewsbury location were allowed to work on and test energized electrical circuits and equipment.

OSHA issues serious citations when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known. In the case of the Shrewsbury post office, OSHA issued 3 willful citations and 4 serious citations, resulting in the $238,000 fine.

The U.S. Department of Labor has also filed an enterprise-wide complaint against the USPS for electrical work safety violations, asking that Postal Service correct electrical violations at all its facilities nationwide. This complaint marks the first time OSHA has sought enterprise-wide relief as a remedy.

Source: US Labor Department’s OSHA proposes $238,000 in fines against US Postal Service for electrical hazards at Shrewsbury, Mass., mail processing facility
, Newswire.com, December 29, 2010 Continue reading

by

An OSHA news release from Friday says that Centimark Corp., a Chelmsford roofing contractor, has been cited by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration for serious alleged safety violations. The contractor is looking at the possibility of $40,000 in fines after an employee was injured when he fell from a 10-foot roof at a New Hampshire work site.

OSHA inspected the site and found that workers were not adequately protected from falls and that no competent person had conducted an inspection to identify or fix the fall hazards. A warning line system was being used, but the pitch of the roof was so steep that it required something more effective like a personal fall arrest system, according to the news release. An OSHA area director said that a competent inspection would have uncovered the need for a better system and prevented the hazard.

OSHA issued a repeat citation for $35,000 for inadequate fall protection and a $5,000 serious citation for the failure to conduct an adequate inspection. The repeat citation arises from similar violations from 2009 and 2010 in Illinois, Texas, and Pennsylvania. Centimark has 15 business days from the receiving the citation to contest it.

Source: OSHA Regional News Release, Chelmsford, Mass., roofing contractor faces $40,000 in fines from US Labor Department’s OSHA following worker fall at Milford, NH, jobsite

When employers fail to protect workers from fall hazards and a worker is injured on the job, workers’ compensation can cover medical and rehabilitation costs, a percentage of your average income, and other compensation. If you have been hurt on the job, our attorneys have the experience and skill to handle your case and get the best results for you.
Continue reading

Contact Information
Cambridge, MA
Main Office
675 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02139
Phone: 617.492.3000Fax: 617.491.3299Toll Free: 800.481.6199
Boston, MA
1 State St
Suite 2
Boston, MA 02109
Phone: 617.547.1205Toll Free: 800.481.6199
Needham, MA
250 First Avenue 2nd Floor
Needham, MA 02494
Phone: 781.675.2329Toll Free: 800.481.6199

Some Select Cases are referred to other attorneys for principal responsibility

By publishing this information on this Website, the Boston, Massachusetts law firm of Altman & Altman LLP is not claiming to represent any clients or cases mentioned here. The content provided is designed to inform readers and is not intended as legal advice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2024, Altman & Altman LLP
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design